Tiered evidence sources

Medical claims draw on your organization's library, specialty-society guidelines, and peer-reviewed literature. Open encyclopedias and patient-facing pages are not accepted as grounds for a medical claim.

Citations you can verify

Citations link to the underlying sources — open the original and check it yourself. When a point cannot be supported at that standard, the answer says so rather than inventing a source.

Just ask the question

Answers are written physician-to-physician by default. No need to state your specialty, how to summarize, where to search, or what format you want — the system already follows medical convention.

Structured the way medicine reads

Comparison tables, decision trees, key points, and commonly-missed pitfalls; a described patient case is worked up with an emergency-first differential.

Four levels of answer review

Choose, per answer, how it is checked. The three review levels run after the answer appears, so each adds a wait for its result.

• No review — The answer as written. Nothing extra runs, so there is no added wait.
• Autoreview — On by default. The answer is re-checked against the source evidence it cites.
• Cross-check — A second, independent AI model reviews the answer against the source evidence available to it.
• Board meeting — Several specialist perspectives debate the evidence, then give one combined conclusion.